Do You Think Medications Are Safe? | Jackson MS Chiropractor | 39213 | Armstrong-King Chiropractic

Do You Think Medications Are Safe?
by Dr. Billie King Shaw

Read Do You Think Medications Are Safe? by Dr. Billie King Shaw to learn more about Armstrong-King Chiropractic and our Chiropractic office in Jackson, MS.

We look forward to serving you! Call - 601-957-7374.

More red flags have been raised due to the potentially life-threatening effects of over-the-counter medications. ADVIL & MOTRIN join the list of Celebrex, Vioxx and Bextra, anti-inflammatory drugs that were taken off the market due to causing serious cardiovascular problems and death.

Further investigations are currently being conducted on the following NSAIDS (non steroidal anti-inflammatory): NAPROXEN, IBUPROFEN AND NUROFEN. These drugs have been linked with suspiciously high numbers of heart attacks in individuals who take them.

VIAGRA has also reared its ugly head again, and has been linked to causing blindness in addition to heat attacks. PROZAC has been black boxed for a sickeningly high association with escalating teenage suicide rates, having been proven to double the risk of suicidal thinking in adolescents.

A more in-depth look at this study reveals that people who use or used pain-reliever medications were dying at twice the rate of the people who did not use pain-relievers.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI’s) are among the most widely prescribed medications. These popular antidepressants (ZOLOFT, PROZAC, and AROPAX, PAXIL) have several side effects as reviewed by the Harvard Medical Mental Health Newsletter. Of diabolical concern is that if these antidepressants are taken with NSAIDS (such as an aspirin, nurofen or naproxen), it seriously increases the risk for severe uterine bleeding in females and reduces the body’s blood clotting ability.

And now for the most shocking of all. There are ZERO long-term controlled peer reviewed studies for all vaccinations for all diseases in all the countries in the world since vaccination was invented. That’s right. ZERO. 209 years to perform a long-term controlled study and not one has been performed. Not one study! How could that be? Isn’t vaccination scientific? We live in an age of scientific studies. Governments and private organizations study anything and everything – and then we read about it in the papers. Recently, the International Endowment of the Humanities spent $25,000 to study why people lie, cheat and swear on the tennis court. The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke spent $160,000 to study whether someone can “hex” an opponent by drawing an ‘X’ on their chest. The National Institute on Alcohol and Abuse spent over one million dollars to find out if drunken fish are more aggressive than sober fish. The National Science Foundation awarded a grant of $220,971 for researchers to study why women smile more than men. This study was a follow-up to another study in 1994 on the meaning of smiles in general. The NSF awarded another grant recently to study the history of the fax machine. Everything is being studied, all the time. Everything, that is, except vaccination.

Why is it, do you think, that the pharmaceutical companies, which fund nearly every study on the planet, do not seem to have any interest in funding long-term controlled studies on vaccination? Makes you wonder doesn’t it?

ALERT ON CERVICAL CANCER VACCINATION

Actually, the vaccination is for proposed protection against the Human Papilloma Virus (Genital Warts – a S.T.D). If left unchecked and undetected for many years, it is one of the causes of cervical cancer…It’s not a vaccine to prevent cervical cancer per se at all!

Recently in Victoria, Australia, 26 young girls from one class were afflicted with temporary paralysis, vomiting, nausea and other severe side effects within minutes of having the shot.

In the United States, there have been over 400 reported incidents so far of severe reactions to the shot, including fractured bones from falling over.

The following offer was made to U.S. licensed medical doctors who routinely administer childhood vaccinations and to pharmaceutical company CEO’s worldwide: $20,000 to the first person who drinks a mixture of standard vaccine additive ingredients in the same amount as a six-year-old child is recommended to receive under the 2000 guidelines of the U. S. Centres for Disease Control Prevention. The mixture will not contain viruses or bacteria like normal, but will contain standard vaccine ingredients in their usual forms and portions.

The mixture was to include, but was not limited to: Thimerosal (mercury), ethyl glycerol (antifreeze), phenol (a disinfectant dye), benzethonium chloride (a disinfectant), formaldehyde (a preservative and disinfectant that’s injected into dead people for medical research) and aluminium. The mixture was to be prepared by three controlled medical professionals and three people the candidate could request. This offer was made in January 29, 2001. To date, no U.S licensed doctors or pharmaceutical company CEO’s have pursued the offer. If it really is safe to jab a vaccine into a 6-year-old child, why not prove its efficacy by drinking the stuff and pocketing $20K? Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

Remember, this month’s Theme of the Month is Medication. This month, all of your friends, co-workers and family members who are battling with Medication are entitled to an Initial Subluxation check-up. Be sure to speak to a member of our team to get your “New Patient Welcome Packet” that you can give to the friend, co-worker or family member that you have in mind.

Did you enjoy it? Share it and make a difference today!

Tags: , , ,



For Your Health,

Dr. Billie King Shaw

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to content